Legal Opinion

Nowak v. Sherman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 19, 1993No. Appeal No. 1PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: The record does not support plaintiff’s contention that a former Special Term Judge had issued an order directing defendant to comply with plaintiff’s discovery demands. The affidavit of that Judge’s former law clerk does not establish that the Judge had made a final decision that was binding on the successor IAS Judge (see, Martin v City of Cohoes, 37 NY2d 162, 165; George W. Collins, Inc. v OlskerMcClain Indus., 22 AD2d 485, 488-489). Furthermore, we find no special circumstances warranting further discovery some *8432 Vi years after filing…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Martin v. City of CohoesNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. George W. Collins, Inc. v. Olsker-McLain Industries, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1965
  3. Joseph v. City of BuffaloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Armatys v. EdwardsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  2. Plunkett v. Emergency Medical ServiceNew York Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Nowak v. ShermanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API