Legal Opinion

Gragg v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided January 17, 1945No. 22938PublishedCited by 23 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

BEAUCHAMP, Judge.

Appellant was convicted of the murder of his wife and the jury assessed the death penalty.

The indictment charges Chesley Arthur Gragg did on the sixteenth day of June, 1943, with malice “kill Flora Gragg, by then and there drowning the said Flora Gragg, * * The appeal raises the question as to the sufficiency of this indictment. We know of no better way to express our conclusion than the following language from Jackson v. State, 28 S. W. 815:

“Omitting preceding portions, the indictment charges that appellant ‘did unlawfully, with malice aforethought, murder and kill Sam Crow…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Huddleston v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1913
  2. Cudd v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1889
  3. Jackson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1894

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Vaughn v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
  2. Coleman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1982
  3. Hobson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1982
  4. De La Cruz v. Combined American Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1975
  5. Ex Parte GraggCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1945

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API