Hinshaw v. Dyer
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the CourtJustice McWilliams
Joseph Dyer and Ann Hoffman brought a replevin action against George Hinshaw, whereby they sought possession of a certain 1959 Cadillac automobile which they claimed to own, and which Hinshaw was said to be wrongfully withholding from them. By his answer Hinshaw admitted that Dyer and Hoffman owned the vehicle in question, but claimed that he had the right to possession inasmuch as “the property had been seized under a lawful judgment and execution issued pursuant to said judgment.....”
Upon trial, one Max Snyder, a self-styled “agent” for Ann Hoffman, was the only witness. From the record it…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Marcus v. OtisCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948
- State Ex Rel. Dean v. Tipton Circuit CourtIndiana Supreme Court · 1962
- Laessig v. May D & F & American Credit Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1965
- Marcus v. OtisCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948
- PETTY, ETC. v. FrielIndiana Supreme Court · 1960
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Vogel v. Carolina International, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1985
- In Re the Marriage of NguyenColorado Court of Appeals · 1983
- Lepage v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2014
- Northstar Project Management, Inc. v. DLR Group, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2013
- Brummer v. StokebrandSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.