Legal Opinion · Dissent

Joyce v. New York Life Insurance Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided November 3, 1933No. 29,597PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Dissent

I agree with the conclusion reached in the first subdivision of Mr. Justice Loring's opinion. But I cannot concur in the result because as matter of law it seems to me to have been "reasonably possible" to give the notice of disability promptly; in any event much sooner than it was in this case. I cannot believe that it was the intention of the statute, 1 Mason Minn. St. 1927, § 3417(5), that mere ignorance or inadvertence of the beneficiary should be magnified into an absolute impossibility. Notice of the disability could have been given promptly by any interested party such as a guardian of…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Joyce v. New York Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API