Legal Opinion

Rogers v. Trent

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided June 12, 1991PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALSH, Justice:

This appeal from a decision of the Family Court presents the question of whether the Family Court has the authority to grant visitation rights to a non-parent. The petitioner-appellant, Phillip Rogers (“Rogers”), filed a petition in the Family Court seeking custody of his minor son. The court granted his petition, but also granted visitation rights to the respondents-appellees, Ruth and William Trent (the “Trents”), the child’s great-aunt and uncle. Rogers contends the Family Court erred as a matter of law in granting visitation rights to the Trents as non-parents. We find this…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Rosemary E.R. v. Michael G.Q.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1984
  2. Elizabeth A. S. v. Anthony M. S.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1981

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Youmans v. RamosMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1999
  2. In the Interests of T.L.M.Delaware Family Court · 2003
  3. McClean v. DotyDelaware Family Court · 2010
  4. In re Adoption K.B.M.Radford County Circuit Court · 1993
  5. J. Mercer v. Active Radiator MPN, Inc. (WCAB)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2024

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API