Legal Opinion

Luce v. Lloyd's of London

District Court, D. Vermont

Decided November 21, 1994No. Civ. A. 5:94-311PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

BILLINGS, Senior District Judge.

On November 4,1994, Plaintiffs William A. Luce and Marie Luce motioned to remand this action to Windham County, Vermont Superior Court. Plaintiffs claim that remand is required because the untimely filing of the Notice of Removal rendered improper the removal of the case from state to federal court. Defendant has objected to the Motion to Remand, claiming that any delay in filing the removal notice was caused by Plaintiffs’ failure to name the correct defendant, and by Plaintiffs’ refusal to provide information that would help Defendant’s agent identify…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kenneth A. Royal v. State Farm Fire and Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
  2. Balestrieri v. Bell Asbestos Mines, Ltd.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1982
  3. Maglio v. F. W. Woolworth Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1982
  4. Antares Oil Corp. v. JonesDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1983
  5. Cooperman v. BOARD OF EDUC. OF HILLSIDE TP.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1983

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ashenden v. Lloyd's of LondonDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1996
  2. Northern Security Insurance v. Mitec Telecom, Inc.District Court, D. Vermont · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API