Legal Opinion

State v. Bradshaw

Utah Supreme Court

Decided October 16, 1975No. 14060Published

1Opinion of the Court

541 P.2d 800 (1975)

The STATE of Utah, Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

Richard Allen BRADSHAW, Defendant and Appellant.

No. 14060.

Supreme Court of Utah.

October 16, 1975.

Michael W. Park, Cedar City, for defendant-appellant.

Vernon B. Romney, Atty. Gen., Earl F. Dorius, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salt Lake City, John O. Christiansen, Beaver County Atty., Beaver, for plaintiff-respondent.

TUCKETT, Justice:

After a trial de novo in the district court, defendant was found guilty of violating Sec. 76-8-305, U.C.A. 1953, as amended, which reads as follows:

A person is guilty of a class B misdemeanor when he…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Henry v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  5. United States v. PetrilloSupreme Court of the United States · 1947

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API