Legal Opinion

O'Connor v. Edmonds

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided April 9, 1951No. 17390PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Head, Justice.

1. “A plaintiff in ejectment must recover on the strength of his own title, and not on the weakness of the defendant’s title.” Code, § 33-101; Fullbright v. Neely, 131 Ga. 342, 344 (62 S. E. 188); Barfield v. Birrick, 151 Ga. 618 (108 S. E. 43); Blalock v. Bell, 172 Ga. 313 (157 S. E. 696); Nelson v. Brown, 174 Ga. 150 (162 S. E. 276); Tapley v. Claxton, 195 Ga. 61 (23 S. E. 2d, 426).

2. The plaintiffs’ claim of title in this ease can not be sustained, since the allegations of the petition and the plaintiffs’ evidence fall squarely within the rulings made in Williams v. O’Connor,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Barfield v. BirrickSupreme Court of Georgia · 1921
  2. Nelson v. BrownSupreme Court of Georgia · 1932
  3. Fullbright v. NeelySupreme Court of Georgia · 1908
  4. Blalock v. BellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1931
  5. Tapley v. ClaxtonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Sanders v. BryantSupreme Court of Georgia · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API