Legal Opinion
Weaver v. Home Security Life Insurance Company
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
Decided December 12, 1973No. 736DC674PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HEDRICK, Judge.
There being no genuine issue as to any material fact, the sole question for our determination is whether defendant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. G.S. 1A-1, Rule 56(c), Rules of Civil Procedure. Resolution of this matter necessitates the construction of the double indemnity provision of the insurance policy in question and particularly the following portion:
“The Company will pay to the beneficiary under this policy, in addition to the amount otherwise payable according to the terms of this policy, an additional amount equal to the Sum Insured, as defined on the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Radcliffe v. National Life & Accident Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1957
- Spott v. Equitable Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Georgie W. McCallum v. Mutual Life Insurance Company of New York, a New York CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1960
- Towner v. Prudential Insurance Company of AmericaLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1962
- Strowmatt v. Volunteer State Life Insurance CompanyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1965
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Brown v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
- Spaid v. Cal-Western States Life InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
- Prather, Thomas, Campbell, Pridgeon, Inc. v. Florilina Properties, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976
- Cassidy v. Occidental Life Insurance Co. of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1979
- Old Dominion Distributors, Inc. v. BissetteCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.