Legal Opinion · Dissent

Industrial Commission v. Warnke

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 20, 1936No. 25509Published

1DissentZimmerman, J.

I cannot subscribe to the general rule relative to the waiver of privileged communications established by the majority of the court.

Let it be distinctly understood that I am heartily in favor of a rule as pronounced, and appreciate that the instant case and similar cases present a persuasive argument for its adoption, but such rule must be promulgated by the General Assembly and not through a forced process of reasoning on the part of this court amounting to judicial legislation.

Section 11494, General Code, provides in mandatory terms that a physician shall not testify concerning a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Maine v. Maryland Casualty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Hamilton v. BayerNebraska Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Auld v. CathroNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Gallun v. Tax CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Industrial Commission v. Belay.Ohio Supreme Court · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API