Industrial Commission v. Warnke
Ohio Supreme Court
1DissentZimmerman, J.
I cannot subscribe to the general rule relative to the waiver of privileged communications established by the majority of the court.
Let it be distinctly understood that I am heartily in favor of a rule as pronounced, and appreciate that the instant case and similar cases present a persuasive argument for its adoption, but such rule must be promulgated by the General Assembly and not through a forced process of reasoning on the part of this court amounting to judicial legislation.
Section 11494, General Code, provides in mandatory terms that a physician shall not testify concerning a…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Maine v. Maryland Casualty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1920
- Hamilton v. BayerNebraska Supreme Court · 1928
- Auld v. CathroNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1910
- Gallun v. Tax CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1934
- Industrial Commission v. Belay.Ohio Supreme Court · 1934