Legal Opinion

Turner v. Pickering

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 21, 1936No. 26228PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGibson, J.

Plaintiff in error, referred to herein as plaintiff, commenced this action in the justice court of the city of Okmulgee against certain defendants to recover the .sum of $15.87 on account. Garnishment proceedings were at the same time instituted, and tlie garnishee answered admitting indebtedness to defendants in the sum of $40.24, and deposited that amount in court.

Thereafter, the defendant 'in error, herein referred to as intervener, filed petition of intervention claiming ownership of said fund so deposited. Judgment was rendered for plaintiff and against defendant for $15.8 i, and the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Edwards v. CosgroSupreme Court of Iowa · 1887
  2. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. LockeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  3. Barnes v. C. B. Cozart Grain Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  4. Willoughby v. SummersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  5. Deming Inv. Co. v. BlakemoreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. London Square Village v. OKLAHOMA CTY. EQUALIZATION AND EXCISE BD.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
  2. Summers v. PowersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  3. London Square Village v. OKLAHOMA CTY. EQUALIZATION AND EXCISE BD.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
  4. Williams Et Ux. v. LacourSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API