State v. Jacqueline R. Robinson

¶ 100. {dissenting.) Wisconsin case law sets forth two separate doctrines governing a judicial change in a sentence: double jeopardy and reflection.1

¶ 101. The majority opinion addresses the defendant's constitutional double jeopardy argument and denies that it addresses the reflection doctrine.2 The majority opinion admits that constitutional double jeopardy protection and the reflection doctrine both apply in "cases concerning a judicial change of a sentence."3 Nevertheless, the majority opinion sometimes addresses the act of reflection but avoids the term and refers to reflection as the…