Legal Opinion
In Re Amatex Corp.
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided January 29, 1990No. 19-11303PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DAVID A. SCHOLL, Bankruptcy Judge.
Resolution of the instant objections by the Debtor, a former manufacturer of products containing asbestos, to a series of claims filed by co-obligors of claims for asbestos-related damages requires us to consider the scope of 11 U.S.C. § 502(e)(1)(B), which requires disallowance of contingent claims for reimbursement or contribution from a debtor. Following the lead of our colleague, the Honorable Bruce Fox, in In re Pacor, Inc., Bankr. Nos. 86-03251F and 86-03252F (Bankr.E.D.Pa. Oct. 25, 1989), we conclude that the scope of § 502(e)(1)(B), in…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- In The Matter Of M. Frenville Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- Grady v. A.H. Robins Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1988
- In Re Johns-Manville Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1986
- Matter of Baldwin-United Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 1985
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- In Re Celotex Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · 1996
- Juniper Development Group v. Kahn (In Re Hemingway Transport, Inc.)District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1991
- First City Beaumont v. Durkay (In Re Ford)Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
- Robert Christopher Associates v. Franklin Realty Group, Inc. (In Re FRG, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1990
- In Re Lull Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 1993
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.