Legal Opinion

Practical Bldg., C., Newark v. Meisol

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided November 16, 1927PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The questions raised by the exceptions to the master's report relate to the priority of claims of certain of the defendants.

The master reported the following order of priority of the various encumbrances, to wit:

1. Mortgage of complainant $2,611.60.

2. Mechanics' lien claims of Eastern Sash and Door Company $1,174.81, and Woodbridge Lumber Company $275.74, to be paid prorata.

3. Second mortgage of defendant Thomas Hand.

4. Third mortgage of defendant John M. Hand (exceptant) $841.83.

5. Eastern Sash and Door Company, on general judgment, $2,026.75.

The Eastern Sash and Door Company filed a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Jacobus v. Mutual Benefit Life InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1876
  2. National Bank of the Metropolis v. SpragueNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1872
  3. Wix v. FrankelNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1917
  4. Thompson v. RamseyNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1907
  5. Mulford v. WilliamsNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1851

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Slachter v. OldermanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
  2. Weiss v. Keystone Realty Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1936
  3. Fifth Street Pier Corp. v. HobokenNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
  4. Blackman v. PinkNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API