Silverstein v. Michau
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York. On writ of error to review a judgment of the District Court for the Southern District of New York for $6,138.03 entered upon the verdict of a jury in favor of the plaintiffs.. The parties will be alluded to as they appeared in the District Court, viz., as plaintiffs and defendants.
1Opinion of the Court
COXE, Circuit Judge.
[1] The action was brought to recover for goods sold by the plaintiffs to the defendants pursuant to two written agreements dated July 1, 1910, and September 7, 1910, by.the terms of which the defendants agreed to purchase “100 Pcs. 50 mets Black Voile 54 ins. 30,795 @ 91%c mark 112,” and also “300 Pcs. 70 mets Black Voile 54 ins. 39,795 @ 91% mark 112” by the first contract, and “500 Pcs. 50 mets Black Voile 49/50 ins. 47,510 @ 78%c mark 147” by the second contract. Translating the language of trade used by the parties into ordinary English, the first order above quoted…
2Cited by6 opinions
- United States v. Stanolind Crude Oil Purchasing Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1940
- Wolfe v. Texas Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1936
- Nicoll v. Pittsvein Coal Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1920
- Western Petroleum Co. v. Tidal Gasoline Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1922
- Hurst v. W. J. Lake & Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1934
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.