Legal Opinion

Cash v. American Surety Company

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 18, 1960No. 38209PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Townsend, Judge.

The burden of proving the employer-employee relationship is on the claimant in a workmen’s compensation ease. Young v. Demos, 70 Ga. App. 577, 579 (28 S. E. 2d 891). However, in view of the liberal interpretation accorded compensation laws generally, it has been held that “in determining whether a claimant in a workmen’s compensation case is an employee and subject to the act, or an independent contractor and not so subject, any doubt is to be resolved in favor of his status as an employee rather than an independent contractor.” Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. v. Henry, 56 Ga. App. 868,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Bentley v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
  2. Mitchem v. Shearman Concrete Pipe Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1932
  3. Home Accident Insurance v. DanielsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1931
  4. Davis v. Starrett Bros.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1929
  5. Liberty Mutual Insurance v. HenryCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1937

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Barbree v. Shelby Mutual Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
  2. Travelers Insurance Co. v. MoatesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1960
  3. Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. PooleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
  4. White v. MorrisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
  5. Oconee County v. RowlandCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API