Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Harte

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 17, 1979PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Howard E. Goldfluss, J.

The Corporation Counsel of the City of New York moves to quash a subpoena duces tecum previously issued by this court directing the Off-Track Betting Corporation, hereinafter refer*87red to as O.T.B., to produce papers and documents relative to the charges against the defendant.

The said defendant stands indicted for criminal mischief in the second and third degrees. The People allege that after having lost an exclusive window glass repair contract servicing all O.T.B. parlors, the defendant sought to discredit his successor by causing window breaks at…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. People ex rel. Hickox v. HickoxAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
  3. People v. AlamoNew York Supreme Court · 1977

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. People v. MorrisonCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1990
  2. People v. ChambersNew York Supreme Court · 1987
  3. People v. NicholasNew York Supreme Court · 1993
  4. People v. BrownCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1980
  5. People v. CammilleriNew York Supreme Court · 1984

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API