Legal Opinion

Van Patten v. Van Patten

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1989No. 89-93PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROWN, Justice, Retired.

The trial court determined that appellee Westamerica Mortgage Company (Westam-erica) had a purchase money mortgage superior to appellants’ equitable title.

Appellants assert two issues:

1. There is no evidence to support the Court’s finding that Defendant’s mortgage was a purchase money mortgage.

2. Is Defendant’s Mortgage superior to Plaintiffs’ equitable title?

Westamerica states that the issues are:

1. Was the trial court correct in finding that the mortgage from Charles Van Patten to Westamerica Mortgage Company was a purchase money mortgage?

2. Did the mortgage to…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Chambliss Et Ux.Oregon Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Powers v. PenseWyoming Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Syracuse Savings & Loan Ass'n v. HassNew York Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Commerce Savings Lincoln, Inc. v. RobinsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Emery v. WardSupreme Court of Colorado · 1920

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Grose v. SauvageauWyoming Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Insight LLC v. Patrick GunterIdaho Supreme Court · 2013
  3. CITIBANK MORTG. CORP. v. Carteret Sav. BankDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993
  4. Insight LLC v. Patrick GunterIdaho Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Insight LLC v. Patrick GunterIdaho Supreme Court · 2013

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API