Legal Opinion · Dissent

Easton Theatres, Inc. v. Wells Fargo Land & Mortgage Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 29, 1982No. 411Published

1DissentFlaherty, Justice

I dissent.

I

Wells Fargo took this appeal from an order of the Superi- or Court affirming the order of the Court of Common Pleas of the Third Judicial District, sitting in equity, requiring that Wells Fargo specifically perform a construction-lease contract to build and lease to Easton a theatre. The Superi- *561or Court also reversed the lower court’s order denying monetary damages to Easton, but Wells Fargo did not appeal that portion of the Superior Court’s order. The dispute arose from a construction-lease executed by the parties in February of 1972 and amended in July of that year. Pursuant to…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Janet D. v. CarrosSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  2. Faden v. Philadelphia Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  3. Sigal v. Manufacturers Light & Heat Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  4. McGovern v. SpearSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  5. Baum v. TonkinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1885

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API