Legal Opinion

In Re Guardianship of Austin

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 10, 1993No. 4-92-0641PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRESIDING JUSTICE STEIGMANN

delivered the opinion of the court:

The Office of State Guardian (OSG) appeals from guardianship orders entered for 14 persons, 10 of the orders naming OSG as limited guardian of the person and estate, and four naming family members as limited guardians of the person and estate. OSG contests (1) the limitations placed upon the guardians’ authority to consent to certain medical and placement decisions, and (2) the inclusion within the orders of the appointment of guardians of the estate. We affirm the 10 guardianship orders naming OSG as limited guardian of the person…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Washington v. HarperSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Kraft, Inc. v. EdgarIllinois Supreme Court · 1990
  3. In Re Marriage of FreemanIllinois Supreme Court · 1985
  4. People v. OrrAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988
  5. Gordon v. GordonIllinois Supreme Court · 1955

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. In re C.E.Illinois Supreme Court · 1994
  2. In Re CEIllinois Supreme Court · 1994
  3. JPMorgan Chase Bank v. WempleAppellate Court of Illinois · 2009
  4. In Re Estate of AustwickAppellate Court of Illinois · 1995
  5. Kanfer v. Busey Trust CompanyAppellate Court of Illinois · 2013

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API