Legal Opinion

Gulfstream Park Racing Ass'n v. Gale

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 7, 1989No. 89-2116Published

1Per curiam

We treat the petition for extraordinary writs filed by Gulfstream Park Racing Association, Inc. as a motion to enforce our mandate previously issued in this cause. See Blackhawk Heating & Plumbing Co. v. Data Lease Financial Corp., 328 So.2d 825, 827 (Fla.1975); Stuart v. Hertz Corp., 381 So.2d 1161, 1163 (Fla. 4th DCA 1980); Art. V, § 4(b)(3), Fla.Const.

In Gulfstream Park Racing Association v. Gale, 540 So.2d 196 (Fla.3d DCA 1989), we granted Gulfstream’s petition for a writ of prohibition and required that the respondent disqualify himself as a judge in this case. We stated:

“Although we…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Bundy v. RuddSupreme Court of Florida · 1978
  2. BLACKHAWK HEAT. & P. CO., INC. v. Data Lease Fin. Corp.Supreme Court of Florida · 1975
  3. Stuart v. Hertz Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
  4. Schwartz v. SchwartzDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
  5. Rogers v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1976

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API