Legal Opinion

Clements v. Austin

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided October 14, 1983PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GODDARD, Judge.

Eugene W. Austin and his wife Lucy C. Austin, Defendants-Appellants, appeal a judgment rendered in favor of Daniel C. Clements and his wife Rosalind C. Clements, Plaintiffs-Appellees, for damages resulting from a breach of covenants as to certain real property transferred by the Austins to the Clements. By their issues on appeal the Austins insist that the suit is barred under Rule 13.01 of the Tennessee Rules of Civil Procedure and also under the doctrine of res judicata or estoppel by judgment.

By deed dated July 26, 1973, the Austins conveyed the property in question…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Blair v. Cleveland Twist Drill Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1952
  2. Frommeyer v. L. & R. CONSTRUCTION CO.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1956
  3. Quelette v. WhittemoreCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1981

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. McKinney v. WidnerCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1987
  2. Carnation Company v. T.U. Parks Construction CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
  3. Walker v. Duracell U.S.A.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Laura Pressley v. Gregorio "Greg" Casar, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2015
  5. Robert Eugene Hulan v. Coffee County BankCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API