Legal Opinion

Rumsey v. Laidley

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided February 7, 1891PublishedCited by 4 opinions

cited 2; Roll. (Nav.) Pr. 272; 3 Graft. 127; 2 Wash. 229. cited Col eh. Coll. Sec. § 425 ; 16 W. Ya. 721; 13 W. Ya. 718.

1Opinion of the Court

English, Jüdge :

George S. Laidley, being indebted to James M. Rumsey, Josiah Roads, and Joseph G. Reed, partners doing business as Rumsey, Roads & Reed, executed to them four notes, all dated the 4th day of November, 1867 — one for six hundred forty six dollars and thirty six cents, payable ninety days after date, to their order, at their counting-room, Portsmouth, Ohio; one for one hundred eighty one dollars and fifty cents, payable thirty days after date, to their order, at the same place; one for one hundred and eighty two dollars and forty cents, payable sixty days after date, to their…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. First National Bank of Wellsburg v. KimberlandsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1880
  2. Nutter v. SydenstrickerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1877
  3. Reeves v. PloughIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
  4. Powell's Adm'r v. HenrySupreme Court of Alabama · 1855
  5. Whitteker v. Charleston Gas Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1880

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lindley v. SullivanIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Kane v. EastmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
  3. York v. Railway Officials & Employes Accident Ass'nWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Kanawha National Bank of Charleston v. HarrisWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API