Legal Opinion

Harper v. Adametz

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided March 1, 1955Published

1Opinion of the Court

142 Conn. 218 (1955)

FOWLER V. HAPPER

v.

JERE ADAMETZ ET AL.

Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Argued January 6, 1955.

Decided March 1, 1955.

BALDWIN, O'SULLIVAN, WYNNE, DALY and BERDON, JS.

Fowler V. Harper, pro se, and Catherine G. Roraback, for the appellant (plaintiff).

Richard C. Parmelee, with whom, on the brief, was Bernard A. Kosicki, for the appellees (defendants).

BALDWIN, J.

This action, based upon fraud, was brought by the plaintiff against the named defendant and his son Walter Adametz. The court rendered judgment for the defendants and the plaintiff has appealed.

The facts found, which are not…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Beatty v. . Guggenheim Exploration Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1919
  2. Quinn v. PhippsSupreme Court of Florida · 1927
  3. Jefferson Standard Life Insurance v. HedrickSupreme Court of Virginia · 1943
  4. Sallies v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1911
  5. Butler v. WatkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1872

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API