Legal Opinion

Rogers v. Newton

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 17, 1976PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This case involves a claim to quiet title. The trial Court, after hearing the evidence ore tenus, quieted title in favor of plaintiff, Roger C. Newton. Doris Rogers and Lilian Price appeal to this Court. We affirm.

On June 30, 1967, Newton executed a lease-sale contract with H.P. McDonald and his wife, Mary. The McDonalds agreed to make regular monthly payments to Newton. These payments were irregular, however, over a period of about six years; and Newton, on at least two occasions, notified the McDonalds of his intention to forfeit their rights under the contract and take possession of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Nelson v. SandersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1898
  2. Patronas v. West Dauphin CorporationSupreme Court of Alabama · 1967
  3. Nichols v. GrahamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1956

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. B.K.W. Enterprises v. Tractor Equip. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1992
  2. Killen v. AkinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1988
  3. Health Science Products, Inc. v. Taylor (In Re Health Science Products, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Alabama · 1995
  4. Hamner v. Rock Mountain Lake, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API