Legal Opinion · Dissent

Clark-Cowlitz Joint Operating Agency v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided August 15, 1986No. 83-2111Published

1Dissent

J. SKELLY WRIGHT, Senior Circuit Judge, with whom MIKVA, Circuit Judge, joins,

dissenting:

I believe the majority’s broad construction of the litigation exemption to the Sunshine Act is inconsistent with the spirit of the Act and with this court’s established approach to such questions. In my view, the panel opinion more accurately reflects the intent of Congress as to the scope of the Sunshine Act. Therefore, I must respectfully dissent.

The Sunshine Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552b (1982), embodies the belief of Congress that openness in government is essential to representative democracy. See…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. National Labor Relations Board v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Federal Trade Commission v. Grolier Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Rawlings v. HecklerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  4. Clark-Cowlitz Joint Operating Agency v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API