Legal Opinion

Schmer v. Gilleland

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided January 9, 1970No. 37308PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

Defendant demurred on the ground that the statute of limitations barred the common law remedy of plaintiff for negligence. Plaintiff’s petition not disclosing the date of commencement of the action, the district court concluded that the demurrer searched the record for the date. The demurrer was accordingly sustained and thej petition dismissed. Plaintiff moved for new trial on the ground of newly discovered evidence' — an affidavit like a return of service. The court overruled the motion. On appeal, plaintiff assigns for error both the reach given the demurrer and the denial of new trial.

The…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Smith v. DayOregon Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Pulliam v. McCleneghanNebraska Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Dolan v. BaldridgeWashington Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Markey Ex Rel. Henry v. HunterNebraska Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Gorgen v. County of NemahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1962

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Schmer v. Hawkeye Security Ins. CompanyNebraska Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Sanitary & Improvement District No. 145 v. NyeNebraska Supreme Court · 1984
  3. George P. Rose Sodding & Grading Co. v. DennisNebraska Supreme Court · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API