Legal Opinion

Robinson v. Arnold

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided October 13, 1998No. 73353PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RICHARD B. TEITELMAN, Judge.

Plaintiff Wilhelmina Robinson filed suit against defendants Sidney and Flora Arnold for personal injuries she sustained as a result of her fall on a defective area of public sidewalk located in front of defendants’ commercial property. The trial court entered summary judgment in favor of defendants on the ground that, as a matter of law, defendants owed no duty to plaintiff to maintain the sidewalk. On appeal, plaintiff contends that although the general rule is that abutting landowners do not owe pedestrians a duty to maintain the public sidewalk, the facts of…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. ITT Commercial Finance Corp. v. Mid-America Marine Supply Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1993
  2. Berry v. Emery, Bird, Thayer Dry Goods Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1948
  3. Hart v. City of ButlerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1965
  4. Teichman v. Potashnick Construction, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1969
  5. Callaway v. Newman Mercantile Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1928

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Beth A. Madden v. City of Iowa CitySupreme Court of Iowa · 2014
  2. Sheila A. Carter v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
  3. Belinda Wilkins v. John Hendel and Patricia Hendel, and City of Maplewood, MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 2022
  4. Beth A. Madden v. City of Iowa CitySupreme Court of Iowa · 2014
  5. Beth A. Madden v. City of Iowa CitySupreme Court of Iowa · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API