Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Armison

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 14, 2014No. Claim No. 1; Claim No. 2; Claim No. 3; Claim No. 4; Claim No. 5; Claim No. 6Published

1Opinion of the CourtDevine, J.

Appeals from 12 decisions of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed January 4, 2013, which ruled that claimants were entitled to receive unemployment insurance benefits.

These six claimants contracted with Gannett Company, Inc. and Gannett Satellite Information Network, Inc. (hereinafter collectively referred to as Gannett) to deliver newspapers and other publications. After the Commissioner of Labor deemed claimants to be employees and therefore eligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits, Gannett objected and requested a hearing on the determination. The Administrative Law…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In re Concourse Ophthalmology Associates, P. C.New York Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. In re the Claim of InterlandiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
  3. In re Claim of WrightAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  4. In re the Claim of AubreyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  5. In re the Claim of O'ConnorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API