People v. Moya
California Court of Appeal
[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]
1Dissent
WHITE, P. J., Dissenting.
I respectfully dissent.
In 1975, the Supreme Court held in Murgia v. Municipal Court (1975) 15 Cal.3d 286 [124 Cal.Rptr. 204, 540 P.2d 44], that “[njeither the federal nor the state Constitution countenances the singling out of an invidiously *1314selected class for special prosecutorial treatment. ... If an individual can show that he would not have been prosecuted except for such invidious discrimination against him, a basic constitutional principle has been violated, and such prosecution must collapse upon the sands of prejudice.” (Id., at p. 290.) Consequently, the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Pitchess v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- People v. MorseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
- People v. RiserCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Murgia v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Cash v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.