Legal Opinion

Seaboard Surety Co. v. United States ex rel. Marshall-Wells Co.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 8, 1936No. 7678PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DENMAN, Circuit Judge.

This appeal arises from a suit brought by the United States for the use of material and supply men against appellant bonding company on a bond given under the Heard Act, 40 U.S.C.A. § 270 (repealed August 24, 1935, 49 Stat. 794), to secure their payment for goods, supplies, and services. The bond was executed by” one B. D. Morley as principal, and appellant as surety, for the performance of Morley’s contract to build for the United States an infirmary building and connecting corridor at the Veterans’ Administration Hospital, Boise, Idaho. Various suppliers became…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Fleischmann Construction Co. v. United States Ex Rel. ForsbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. United States Ex Rel. Hine v. MorseSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  3. United States, ex rel. Fidelity Nat. Bank v. RundleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1900
  4. Mandel v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1925
  5. United States v. Ætna Casualty & Surety Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1925

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. United States Ex Rel. Mutual Metal Mfg. Co. v. BiggsDistrict Court, E.D. Illinois · 1942
  2. Kansas City Life Ins. v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1938
  3. United States Ex Rel. Johnson v. Morley Const. Co.District Court, W.D. New York · 1936
  4. United States Ex Rel. Jones Contracting Co. v. SkilkenDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1943
  5. Fett Roofing & Sheet Metal Co. v. Seaboard Surety Co.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1968

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API