Legal Opinion

Routh v. Routh

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 10, 1942No. 30540PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

The record discloses that the defendant had obtained a decree of separate maintenance prior to the action commenced in the trial court for divorce by the plaintiff. At the conclusion of all of the testimony the trial court found for the plaintiff and entered the decree of divorce.

This proceeding is brought by the defendant, and in the petition in error and brief in support thereof two propositions are presented. It is argued that where there is a decree of separate maintenance unmodified and from which no appeal is taken, this constitutes a determination which prevents either party from…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Tahona Smokeless Coal Co. v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  2. Bruce v. BruceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  3. Burke v. BurkeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  4. Kunze v. KunzeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
  5. Newberry v. NewberrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. McLaughlin v. McLaughlinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
  2. Murphy v. MurphySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1954
  3. Peterson v. PetersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952
  4. Reding v. RedingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API