S.P.Q.R. Co. v. United Rockland Stairs, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Contrary to the plaintiffs’ contention, the Supreme Court did not err in granting the motion of the defendant United Rockland Stairs, Inc., for a preliminary injunction (see CFLR 6301, 6312 [c]; Doe v Axelrod, 73 NY2d 748 [1988]; Matter of Advanced Digital Sec. Solutions, Inc. v Samsung Techwin Co., Ltd., 53 AD3d 612, 613 [2008]; Ruiz v Meloney, 26 AD3d 485, 486 [2006]). While it is true the plaintiffs showed the existence of at least a factual question as to the true ownership of the disputed parcel, that was not, under the circumstances of this case, a sufficient reason to deny the motion…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Doe v. AxelrodNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
- Ruiz v. MeloneyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Ying Fung Moy v. Hohi UmekiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Stockley v. GorelikAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Kelley v. GarudaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Masjid Usman, Inc. v. Beech 140, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- 84-85 Gardens Owners Corp. v. 84-12 35th Avenue Apartment Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Olympic Ice Cream Co., Inc. v. SussmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- Brach v. Harmony Services, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Young v. CrosbyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.