Legal Opinion

Jacobs v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 29, 1992No. 91-2390PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COBB, Judge.

The appellant raises several points on appeal. First, it is contended the trial court should have declared a mistrial because the prosecutor, during opening statement, cautioned the jury to listen very carefully to the defense’s alibi witnesses because they had given inconsistent statements. The trial court instructed the jury to disregard any statements concerning an alibi, but denied a motion for mistrial. Ultimately, the defense presented no evidence.

In closing argument the prosecutor maintained that the defense had presented no evidence to contradict the state’s case, and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Occhicone v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1990
  2. White v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1979
  3. State v. ThomasSupreme Court of Florida · 1986
  4. Torres v. Illinois Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Romero v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. DuncanCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1998
  2. Frederick v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
  3. Swan v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API