Legal Opinion

Ford Motor Credit Co. v. Mells

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided February 10, 1982No. 38138PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Marshall, Justice.

This case is here on certiorari. It requires us to journey into the labyrinthian provisions of the Truth in Lending Act (TILA) and the implementing Federal Reserve Board Regulation Z. 15 USC § 1601 et seq.; 12 CFR § 226.1 et seq. The Court of Appeals has held that under *107language employed in Ford Motor Credit Co. v. Milhollin, 444 U. S. 555 (100 SC 790, 63 LE2d 22) (1980), a creditor violates TILA and Regulation Z by failing to disclose on the face of a credit agreement differing methods used to rebate unearned finance charges on acceleration triggered by default and on…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Ford Motor Credit Co. v. MilhollinSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Joyce Stewart v. Ford Motor Credit CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982
  2. Kedziora v. Citicorp National Services, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1995
  3. Ford Motor Credit Corp. v. MellsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
  4. Joyce Stewart v. Ford Motor Credit CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API