Legal Opinion

Croce v. Buckley

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 5, 1906PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal by the plaintiff, Mary Croce, as executrix, etc., of Andrew Croce, deceased, from a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the defendant, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Mew York on the 1st day of March, 1906, upon the dismissal of the complaint by direction of the. court after á trial at the Mew York Trial Term.

1Opinion of the Court

. O’Brien, P. J.:

From the facts as stated in the opinion of Mr. Justice Scott it is evident that the elevator was a scaffold within section 18 of the Labor Law (Laws of 1897, chap. 415), which is as follows: “A person employing or directing another to perform labor of any kind in the erection, repairing, altering or painting of a house, building or structure, shall, not furnish or erect, or cause to be furnished or erected for the performance of such labor, scaffolding, hoists, stays, ladders or other mechanical contrivances which are unsafe, unsuit*355able or improper, and which are not so…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bounougias v. Republic Steel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1960
  2. Gabbamonte v. 16-20 West 19th Street, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1961
  3. In re New York Electric Lines Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1910
  4. Bower v. Holbrook, Cabot & Rollins Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908
  5. Gust Bounougias v. Republic Steel Corporation, a Foreign Corporation, Republic Steel Corporation, a Corporation, Third Party v. Alavina O'malley, D/B/A B. Pedersen & Company, Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API