Legal Opinion

Kemp v. Zoning Board of Appeals

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 19, 1995PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the respondent Zoning Board of Appeals of the Village of Wappingers Falls dated August 10, 1993, which, after a *467hearing, granted the respondent Tony Rabadi a use variance, the petitioners appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Jiudice, J.), dated February 18, 1994, which dismissed the petition on the ground that the petitioners lacked standing.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly concluded that the appellants failed to establish that the variance in question…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Sun-Brite Car Wash, Inc. v. Board of Zoning & AppealsNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. Dairylea Cooperative, Inc. v. WalkleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1975

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Friedman v. Town ClerkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  2. Long Island Business Aviation Ass'n v. Town of BabylonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  3. Rockland Hospitality Associates, LLC v. ParisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  4. Scannell v. Town Board of SmithtownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API