Legal Opinion · Dissent

Biscayne Park, LLC v. Wal-Mart Stores East, LP

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 17, 2010No. 3D08-3219Published

1DissentGersten, J.

I respectfully dissent for two reasons. First, Wal-Mart Stores East, LP (“Wal-Mart”) satisfied the requirements for the temporary injunction. Second, the temporary injunction is now moot. Therefore, I would affirm.

This controversy arose out of a failed contract to purchase land. Wal-Mart contracted to purchase land used as a trailer park from Biscayne Park, LLC (“Biscayne”). The contract permitted Wal-Mart to conduct a due diligence inspection on the land and to terminate the contract prior to closing if, after due diligence, Wal-Mart did not want to purchase the land.

Before closing on this…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Briceno v. BRYDEN INVESTMENTS, LTD.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008
  2. Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Bay Bank & Trust Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
  3. LaRose v. A.K.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API