Legal Opinion

Clay v. Pennoyer Creek Improvement Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 1876PublishedCited by 20 opinions

Certiorari to Probato Court of Newaygo County.

1Opinion of the Court

Maeston, J:

Defendant in error is a corporation formed under ‘‘An act to authorize the formation of corporations for the purpose of improving the navigation of rivers,” approved April*. 5th, 1869, being chapter 85 of the Oomp. Laws.

Upon the 10th day of January, 1876, a petition was filed, on behalf of said corporation in the'probate court of Newaygocounty, praying the court to appoint three commissioners to> ascertain and determine whether it was necessary to the-public interests to take certain lands therein described, owned by David P. Clay, for the purpose proposed in said petition, and if…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Mok v. Detroit Building & Savings Ass'n No. 4Michigan Supreme Court · 1875

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Alan v. Wayne CountyMichigan Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Lapeer County Clerk v. Lapeer Circuit CourtMichigan Supreme Court · 2003
  3. United States Gypsum Co. v. Kent Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Toledo, Ann Arbor & North Michigan Railway Co. v. Detroit, Lansing & Northern RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Department of Conservation v. ConnorMichigan Supreme Court · 1948

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API