Legal Opinion

Trinidad v. Florida Peninsula Insurance Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 18, 2011No. 3D10-1087PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRothenberg, J.

Amado Trinidad (“Trinidad”), the plaintiff below, appeals a summary judgment granted in favor of the insurer of his home, Florida Peninsula Insurance Company (“Florida Peninsula”). Trinidad’s lawsuit was based on Florida Peninsula’s failure to pay him for overhead and profit. Because Trinidad’s insurance policy is unambiguous, and he has not contracted to incur or incurred these costs, the trial court properly granted summary judgment in favor of Florida Peninsula, and we affirm.

After a fire damaged Trinidad’s house on February 11, 2008, he submitted a claim for payment to Florida Peninsula.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Penzer v. Transportation Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 2010
  2. Florida Farm Bureau Cas. Ins. Co. v. CoxSupreme Court of Florida · 2007
  3. STATE FARM FLORIDA INS. CO. v. LorenzoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007
  4. Building Educ. Corp. v. Ocean BankDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008
  5. Goff v. State Farm Florida Ins. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Trinidad v. Florida Peninsula Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 2013
  2. Haynes v. Universal Property & Casualty Insurance Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
  3. Juvonen v. United Property & Casualty Insurance Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
  4. Trinidad v. Florida Peninsula Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API