Legal Opinion

Reed v. Shepley

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided April 15, 1834PublishedCited by 15 opinions

This was ejectment for the whole of Lot No. 16, Range 6, and the east half of Lot No. 16, in Range 7, in Lowell. Sei-sin and ouster, Oct. 29th, 1832. The plaintiff gave in evidence, without objection, his letter of administration, granted by the court of probate for the district of Orleans, October 27th, 1832. He also read in evidence the following conveyances, which were duly acknowledged and recorded, viz: a deed from said Andrew Craigin to Ebenezer Rust, dated November…

Read the full summary

This was ejectment for the whole of Lot No. 16, Range 6, and the east half of Lot No. 16, in Range 7, in Lowell. Sei-sin and ouster, Oct. 29th, 1832. The plaintiff gave in evidence, without objection, his letter of administration, granted by the court of probate for the district of Orleans, October 27th, 1832. He also read in evidence the following conveyances, which were duly acknowledged and recorded, viz: a deed from said Andrew Craigin to Ebenezer Rust, dated November 26th, 1818, of Lot No. 16 in Range 6, and a mortgage of the same lot from said Ebenezer Rust to said Craigin, dated…

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Collamer, J.

— Mortgagors are estopped to deny the title they have created in the mortgagee. When any part of the purchase money is due, the mortgagor becomes, sub modo, tenant at will to the mortgagee, and as tenant, is not permitted to deny his landlord’s title. When Ebenezer died, his estate, under our statute, passed by-descent to his father, John, who took possession. This possession had no character adverse to Craigin. A possession always enures to the legal right of the possessor, and so Craigin could not have treated John as a wrong doer. John…

2Cited by15 opinions

  1. Sparhawk v. Administrator of Ozias BuellSupreme Court of Vermont · 1837
  2. Marvel v. OrtlipCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1866
  3. Stout v. MerrillSupreme Court of Iowa · 1872
  4. Houghton v. TolmanSupreme Court of Vermont · 1902
  5. Vada Naval Stores Co. v. SappSupreme Court of Georgia · 1919

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API