Legal Opinion

Jacksonville Savings Bank v. Kovack

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided January 14, 2002No. 04-01-0730PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Steigmann

In July 2001, plaintiff, Jacksonville Savings Bank (Bank), filed a complaint against defendant, Mark Kovack, alleging that he had illegally received funds belonging to the Bank while employed there. Later that month, Kovack filed a motion to stay the civil proceedings until a pending federal criminal investigation involving the same wrongful conduct was resolved. Following an August 2001 hearing, the trial court denied Kovack’s motion to stay the proceedings.

Kovack appeals, arguing only that the trial court abused its discretion by denying his motion to stay the civil proceedings. We affirm.

I.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Baxter v. PalmigianoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. United States v. KordelSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Charles H. Keating, Jr. v. Office of Thrift SupervisionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  4. Federal Savings & Loan Insurance v. MolinaroCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  5. Trustees of the Plumbers & Pipefitters National Pension Fund v. Transworld Mechanical, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1995

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Cordeck Sales, Inc. v. Construction Systems, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2008
  2. CHB Uptown Properties, LLC v. Financial Place Apartments, LLCAppellate Court of Illinois · 2007
  3. Davies v. PasambaAppellate Court of Illinois · 2014
  4. Doe v. JohnstonAppellate Court of Illinois · 2022
  5. Universal Metro Asian Services Ass'n v. MahmoodAppellate Court of Illinois · 2021

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API