Legal Opinion

Royster v. Royster

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided November 7, 1960No. 5-2251PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Ed. F. McFaddin, Associate Justice.

The transcript in this case was filed in this Court on August 4, 1960, and appellant seasonably filed his abstract and brief. Now, in advance of submission of the case on its merits, the appellee has filed a motion asking us to dismiss the appeal because, “The appellant has failed to file an abstract or abridgment of the record in such manner as to give the Court a clear understanding of all the questions presented to the Court for decision.”1 There seems to be some general misunderstanding as to the effect of the present Rule 9 since we frequently have…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Porter v. Time Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1957
  2. Ellington v. RemmelSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1956
  3. Farmers Union Mutual Ins. v. WattSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1958
  4. Milum v. ClarkSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1956
  5. Smock v. CorpierSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1956

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Brace v. BusboonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API