Legal Opinion

Frill v. Frill

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 3, 1923No. Appeal, No. 157PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Chief Justice Moschzisker,

R. H. Frill sued B. F. Frill and Floyd Frill, alleging that', on November 3, 1920, they had purchased all his *326interest1 in the “equipment, timber and manufactured lumber” on a certain tract of land, and had failed to pay the agreed price. An affidavit of defense was filed by B. F. Frill, denying, inter alia, that he had made the alleged purchase, either individually or jointly with his son Floyd; the latter interposed no defense, by affidavit or otherwise. At the trial, the court below entered a non-suit, which it subsequently declined to remove; hence…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Parker v. Matheson Motor Car Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1913
  2. Flick v. Northampton & Bath RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lineaweaver's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  2. McMahon v. Reading Transit & Light Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API