Legal Opinion

Furniss v. Lower Merion Township

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 12, 1963No. Appeal, 9PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Me. Chief Justice Bell,

Neighboring property owners petitioned the Court of Common Pleas of Montgomery County to declare an ordinance invalid * because the permit for an apartment house constituted ad hoc rezoning of 40 acres, and because it constituted a flagrant violation of the applicable Township Comprehensive Plan especially in regard to the density of population as set forth in the plan. The Planning Commission made the following apt statement:

“. . . a word should be said with respect to a misunderstanding which frequently arises in connection with the adoption of any…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Gladwyne Colony, Inc. v. Lower Merion TownshipSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Cleaver v. Board of AdjustmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  2. Village 2 at New Hope, Inc. AppealsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  3. Family Golf of Nashville, Inc. v. Metropolitan Government of Nashville & Davidson CountyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1997
  4. Doran Investments v. Muhlenberg Township Board of CommissionersCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  5. Willdel Realty, Inc. v. New Castle CountySupreme Court of Delaware · 1971

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API