Legal Opinion

State v. Burchard

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided March 2, 1993No. 19378PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SWANSTROM, Judge.

Roger Burchard entered an Alford 1 plea to two counts of securities fraud. The plea was the result of an agreement reached with the prosecutor’s office that the state would dismiss counts II, III, and IV in exchange for a guilty plea on counts I and Y. Through his conditional plea of guilty, pursuant to I.C.R. 11(a)(2), Burchard specifically reserved the right to appeal the district court’s denial of his motion to dismiss. He timely appealed from the judgment of conviction in this case. We affirm.

The charges against Burchard stemmed from his activities while in the employ of…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. United States v. MarionSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. United States v. LovascoSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. State v. CreechIdaho Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Doe v. DurtschiIdaho Supreme Court · 1986

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. AverettIdaho Court of Appeals · 2006
  2. State v. DavisIdaho Court of Appeals · 2005
  3. State v. MillsIdaho Court of Appeals · 1996
  4. State v. Dustin Jade MrganIdaho Court of Appeals · 2017
  5. State v. MeierIdaho Court of Appeals · 2010

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API