Legal Opinion

Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. Herman Bros.

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided April 12, 1957No. 34041PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMessmore, J.

This appeal is directly related to a companion case, No. 34040, Chicago, B. & Q. R. R. Co. v. Herman Bros., Inc., ante p. 247, 82 N. W. 2d 395. While these cases were heard on separate records, in many respects the *267principles involved are identical, and the issues in the two cases are so closely related that the argument of the appellants in opposing the orders issued by the Nebraska State Railway Commission, hereinafter referred to as the commission, are very similar. We have considered the two cases together, but deem it necessary to render separate opinions in connection with the same due…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. Herman Bros.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Ward Transport, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1954

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. Iowa State Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1960
  2. Ready Mix, Inc. v. Nebraska Railroads of Western Trunk Lines CommitteeNebraska Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Chicago, B. & QR Co. v. IOWA STATE COMMERCE COM'NSupreme Court of Iowa · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API