Gaar, Scott & Co. v. Brundage
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendant from an order of the district court for Martin county, Quinn, J., denying a motion for a new trial.
1Opinion of the CourtStart, C. J.
Action to recover a balance of $102.78 and interest for threshing machine extras and repairs sold and delivered by the plaintiff to the defendant. The answer denied the allegations of the com*413plaint, and set up a counterclaim for $564, alleged to be due from plaintiff to the defendant as commissions on tbe sale of- a threshing machine outfit. The reply put in issue the' allegations of the answer as to the alleged counterclaim. The cause was tried by the court without a jury. Findings of fact were made, and as a conclusion of law therefrom it was found that the defendant was not entitled to…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Adams v. CastleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
- Baskerville v. Gaar, Scott & Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1900
3Cited by2 opinions
- Maul v. SteeleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
- Cornell v. N. F. C. Engineering Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1966