Legal Opinion

Inderjit Kaur Puri v. Shakti Parwha Kaur Khalsa

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided August 19, 2013No. 34,325; Docket 31,178PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FRY, Judge.

{1} This case requires us to interpret NMSA 1978, Section 45-3-108(A)(4) (2011), which provides an exception to the Probate Code’s three-year time limit for opening a formal testacy or appointment proceeding under certain circumstances. Under this exception, a personal representative appointed more than three years after the decedent’s death has the right to possess estate assets only to the extent necessary to confirm title in those assets, and no claims, other than for administrative expenses, may be asserted against the estate. The district court permitted the initiation…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Schwartzman v. Schwartzman Packing Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Matter of Estate of TaylorMontana Supreme Court · 1984
  3. In Re Estate of BacaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1999
  4. Matter of Estate of WoodCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985
  5. Houston v. YoungNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1980

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Khalsa v. PuriNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2015
  2. Premier Oil & Gas, Inc. v. WelchNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2020
  3. Khalsa v.PurlNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API