Legal Opinion

Ford Motor Co. v. Moore

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided May 1, 2009No. 73A05-0710-CV-552PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BAILEY, Judge.

Case Summary

Ford Motor Co. ("Ford") & TRW Vehicle Safety Systems, Inc. ("TRW") appeal following the denial of their Motion to Correct Error, which challenged a jury verdict in favor of Sally Moore, as the Personal Representative of the Estate of Daniel A. Moore ("the Estate"), upon the Estate's product negligence claim. We reverse.

Issue

Ford and TRW challenge the sufficiency of the evidence, the evidentiary rulings of the trial court, and the denial of Ford's request for a mistrial. We find dispositive a single issue: whether the Estate presented sufficient evidence to…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Billy D. Bammerlin v. Navistar International Transportation Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
  2. Ford Motor Co. v. RushfordIndiana Supreme Court · 2007
  3. John W. WHITTED, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION, and New United Motor Manufacturing, Inc., Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
  4. John Lucille v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
  5. Miller v. ToddIndiana Supreme Court · 1990

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Barbara Kaiser v. Johnson & JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2020
  2. TRW Vehicle Safety Systems, Inc. v. MooreIndiana Supreme Court · 2010
  3. Barbara Kaiser v. Johnson & JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2020
  4. Ford Motor Co. v. MooreIndiana Court of Appeals · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API